Skip to main content

Thomas Carlyle (IEI): Personality Type Analysis

  Thomas Carlyle (Often referred to as the Sage of Chelsea) was a Scottish historian and philosopher often credited as the creator of the Great Man Theory of history. Having emerged as the top expert on German Idealism, he would become highly critical of the more empirical approach to history often represented by Leopold Von Ranke (LSE), and embody an alternative and much less  approach to history.

    The first thing that stands out when reading any of Carlyle’s works is his fixation on the transcendent. On Heroes, Hero-Worship, & the Heroic in History is the work often cited as the creation of the great man school of history. The book (originally a series of lectures) waxes lyrically (and often unintelligibly) about the impact of great men. The following quote from that book’s first paragraph should make it clear what the appeal of great men was to Carlyle:

    “For, as I take it, Universal History, the history of what man has accomplished in this  world, is at bottom the History of the Great Men who have worked here. They were the leaders of men, these great ones; the modellers, patterns, and in a wide sense creators, of whatsoever the general mass of men contrived to do or to attain; all things that we see standing accomplished in the world are properly the outer material result, the practical realization and embodiment, of Thoughts that dwelt in the Great Men sent into the world: the soul of the whole world's history, it may justly be considered, were the history of these.” 


    From this quotation, it is evident that the value he finds in great men comes from their massive impacts that echo through the course of history. This shows a strong degree of valuation for both F and T. Furthermore, this is T’s idealization of F. This is highly suggestive of T1 and F5. His attitude towards I is evident when it comes to his attitude toward the tendency of finding faults in great men. While he concedes that they do not lack flaws, he also sees little value in focusing on them. This shows a strong disinterest in speculation that complicates his view of capital T truth. This is consistent with I7. Carlyle lived the life of an intellectual with the level of inactivity that one would associate with that lifestyle. However, despite this fact, the figures he tended to like were highly active and impactful figures. This is consistent with the notion that he preferred action to stability despite not being a man of action. This is consistent with S3 and F5. Carlyle’s approach to logic is obvious simply from pursuing On Heroes, Hero-Worship, & the Heroic in History. There is almost nothing solidly factual in the whole text. It simply teases out an understanding of the significance through almost incoherent ramblings. This shows a high degree of L without the P supplementing it. However this tendency was put even more on display in his attempt to write a biography of Frederick the Great (LIE). He set out to write a biography due to the fact that he embodied his ideal of a great man. However, once he got into the relevant archives and studied the relevant battlefields, he was overwhelmed by the facts. The work ended up expanding into 6 volumes published with Carlyle himself referring to the process as “his thirteen year war with Frederick the Great”. This all shows that despite having some skill as a philosopher, his ability to deal with factual information was limited. This is a good example of P4 and L6. Carlyle’s approach to ethics was more sophisticated and evident in the notion of great man history. It is a perspective which is highly concerned with specific individuals while treating most as fungible. It does this primarily by determining who qualifies as great figures. However these people are not identified through the virtue of their character, but instead by their impact and legacy. In this way it links the relational with the public in a way that prioritizes the values of the public. This is consistent with R8 and E2. With T1, E2, S3, P4, F5, L6, I7, and R8 demonstrated, it is safe to conclude that Thomas Carlyle was an IEI. 

    

Sources

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmJwmw0Rwdg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_YBTC20fLg&t=1087s

On Heroes, Hero-Worship, & the Heroic in History

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/1091/1091-h/1091-h.htm For the Text

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLhsQghry7nhWzVvYSi_azb4OHWrMkfzCJ Audiobook form available on Youtube

History of Friedrich II. of Prussia, Called Frederick the Great

https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/25808/pg25808-images.html




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Socionics Type Profiles

Here is an easy reference list for the profiles of the sixteen Socionics types. Just click on the type name to read the profile. Alpha Intuitive Logical Energiser (ILE) Sensory Ethical Integrator (SEI) Ethical Sensory Energiser (ESE) Logical Intuitive Integrator (LII) Beta Ethical Intuitive Energiser (EIE) Logical Sensory Integrator (LSI) Sensory Logical Energiser (SLE) Intuitive Ethical Integrator (IEI) Gamma Sensory Ethical Energiser (SEE) Intuitive Logical Integrator (ILI) Logical Intuitive Energiser (LIE) Ethical Sensory Integrator (ESI) Delta Logical Sensory Energiser (LSE) Ethical Intuitive Integrator (EII) Intuitive Ethical Energiser (IEE) Sensory Logical Integrator (SLI)

ILI - Intuitive Logical Integrator - "The Critic"

This is the profile for the Intuitive Logical Integrator (ILI). To see more type profiles, click here . Isaac Newton 1. Time The ILI is disposed towards inner reflections on the flow of events. Detaching from trivial concerns, ILIs turn their attention to the more important and far-reaching matters of life. Penetrating the misty vestiges of the past and future through depth of imagination, ILIs tend to synthesise for themselves a profoundly realist, neutral world view that can be perceived as 'bleak' or 'gloomy' by others. Such a world view is frequently in the form of a singular eventuality that current events will head towards given certain variables. For them, the present is only important in so much as it is the midway point between what has happened and what will happen, and that sometimes actions can be undertaken to change or alter that interaction, usually in the form of preventing stupidity that might lead to disaster later on. Often what is completely ...

IEI - Intuitive Ethical Integrator - "The Mystic"

This is the type profile for the Intuitive Ethical Integrator (IEI). To see more type profiles, click here . Marilyn Monroe 1 . Time IEIs can be characterised by a continuous search for meaning and purpose in their lives and the world in general. With a tendency to detach from daily affairs, they enter a state of deep self-reflection, looking back through their recollections and looking ahead to the probable future which they feel humanity is heading towards. IEIs tend to possess a dissatisfaction with the superficiality of daily existence, instead believing in some greater calling that must be connected with and understood before being ultimately accepted. Frequently, an IEI will be disposed towards the wanderings of their imagination, running memories through their mind again and again to fathom the steps of their personal journey. IEIs may also try to look ahead and envision a shared utopia for themselves and those they identify with. This continual search results in...