What is most unique about Carl Sagan's research papers, is his recursive passion for seeking out new astronomical information and experiences that stimulates the mind of the reader, thus opening up the reader to new possibilities for thought. Typically, his books address a very broad range of concepts in astronomy, extending beyond what is usually expected to be mentioned in books about astronomy to going in expansive depth on general scientific knowledge to abstract theories. In addition, his books frequently mention theories that were poorly understood at the time or simply unknown phenomenon without essential explanation. It is clear that Carl Sagan was heavily drawn to the abstract side of how the world works and his approach to scientific research was philosophically bent, with a quality of connecting various scientific concepts that were discussed by individuals at the time into a grand simplification of science - so that his conclusions could make logical sense to those reading his published works at the time. This gives the notion of someone with a preference of logical optimism over critical skepticism in dealing with abstract theories, providing the case for a type with Ego I+L, most likely I1 and L2 considering his very broad range of concepts covered in his works support the idea of Strong and Bold I.
Carl Sagan pertained to a style in his writing of systematizing his insights about the universe and contributing essential details towards emerging theories at the time. These details applied across a vast number of works produced by historical scientists, utilizing this information and applying it into a grand framework of the universe that Stephen Hawking had been longing to cultivate. In open ended discussion and interviews, Carl Sagan wanted to include those from heavy academic backgrounds who enjoyed an intellectual challenge to people who didn't know very much about science - but still was as passionate about it as Carl was. Another interesting notion was that Carl Sagan included those he disagreed with in these discussions, showing a greater interest in generating an Alpha group atmosphere with L-focused frameworks on how the universe works to E-focused digressions responding on the emotional significance of humanity's place in the cosmic arena. Overall, Carl Sagan couldn't help but share his insights on the interesting scientific discoveries of the time and always had some interesting topic on his mind.
Carl Sagan would often skeptically interrogate and propose thought provoking questions towards religious fanatics during more serious interviews and he often had a propensity to point out the flaws in a doctrine or set of laws that he perceived to be false. In one article, he wrote; “If you’re only skeptical, then no new ideas make it through to you. You never learn anything. You become a crotchety misanthrope convinced that nonsense is ruling the world. (There is, of course, much data to support you.) Since major discoveries at the borderlines of science are rare, experiences will tend to confirm your grumpiness. But every now and then a new idea turns out to be on the mark, valid and wonderful. If you’re too resolutely and uncompromisingly skeptical, you’re going to miss (or resent) the transforming discoveries in science, and either way, you will be obstructing understanding and progress. Mere skepticism is not enough.” This approach to skepticism through maintaining an expansive and eclectic mindset is often present in types with T7, limiting himself to only select resources to base his work off of repulsed him and instead he chose to spread his endeavors over an expansive scope of territories.
Carl Sagan continued doing what he did from the start, promoting science and "eagerly passing on the marvels of the universe to a huge number of individuals on TV and in books." Whenever Sagan showed up on ''The Tonight Show" with Johnny Carson amid the 70s and 80s, his objective was to interface with regular Americans, individuals who didn't subscribe to Scientific American, and the expansion of people's general understanding of science. Within these discussions, Carl Sagan lightheartedly enthused about the history of science and engaged the audience with captivating explanations of how the world works. Aside from strongly supporting the advancement of fostering the scientific education, his critics have outed Carl Sagan as a publicity seeker and careerist more concerned to maintain his reputation than to examine the facts about the universe empirically. This at the very least suggests a strong emphasis on E, in passionately getting the audience involved in his brilliant and skeptical rhetoric that would overshadow his methods of carefully integrating P to substantiate his explanations, often by referencing specific studies or examples in history. Thus making Bold, Weak E6 and Strong, Cautious P8 very likely suggestions for Sagan.
From what I've listed above about Carl Sagan is already is consistent with I1, L2, E6, T7 and P8. Consequently, I think that Carl Sagan is a very good representative of the ILE type of information metabolism.
No comments:
Post a Comment