Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek (1887-1975), also known as Jiang Jieshi, was a Chinese revolutionary, general, and President of the Republic of China from 1927 until his defeat at the hands of Mao Zedong (EIE) in the Chinese Civil War in 1949, after which he and his government fled to the island of Taiwan, which he ruled until his death in 1975. First taking part as a military leader in the Xinhai revolution against the Qing dynasty in 1911 led by Sun Yat-sen, Chiang rose through the ranks of the nationalist party, called the Kuomintang, and eventually became commander-in-chief of the National Revolutionary Army. In this leading role, Chiang led the Northern Expedition to reclaim the vast majority of China which was controlled by warlords, and with his rule over China established, he presided over the Nanjing Decade, which was a period of unprecedented economic growth from 1927-1937. This was followed by the Japanese invasion of 1937, triggering the Second Sino-Japanese War, which had a very mixed legacy, with continued appeasement of Japan, brutal human rights abuses, rampant corruption within the military and bureaucracy, as well as many poor military decisions. In Taiwan, Chiang ruled as military dictator through martial law and oversaw both rapid economic growth and continued human rights abuses. To his supporters, Chiang was a visionary leader and staunch patriot who did what was necessary to defend China from its external and internal enemies. To his (more numerous) detractors, he was an incompetent and corrupt dictator over a kleptocratic regime who bungled his way through several wars and lost the mainland to the communists, despite having had a decisive advantage.
Central to Chiang’s personal and public life was a need to meet his very high standards. In his personal life, Chiang was primarily influenced by his neo-Confucian values and education, with a strong focus on discipline, duty, and self-improvement (which primarily took the form of self-criticism). In pursuit of these ideals, Chiang was an extreme perfectionist, or at least attempted to be one. Though often failing to live up to his ideals, Chiang would engage in endless self-criticism in his diary, constantly trying to align with his image of perfection and his values. These were practices that Chiang began at an early age and would continue for the rest of his life.
Politically, Chiang was staunchly ideological and legalistic. First and foremost in his political philosophy were always a set of core principles to be followed. While Chiang’s vision was mostly inspired by another revolutionary, Sun Yat-sen (a topic which I will cover later), Chiang’s pursuit of this vision always followed a set of core principles, specifically nationalism, rights of the people (often translated as democracy), and people’s livelihoods (sometimes translated as ‘socialism’). While these principles were initially outlined by Sun Yat-Sen, they remained vague enough to placate everyone who needed to be placated (including right-wing nationalists and left-wing communists) until Chiang devoted himself to his clearer interpretation of these principles, which would be augmented by Chiang’s personal neo-Confucian and later Christian views, principles which Chiang would attempt to instill in China and Taiwan for the rest of his life. So important were these principles that when Chiang Kai-shek was in charge of the Whampoa Military Academy where the officers that would take part in the Northern Expedition studied, military tactics made up only one quarter of all lessons, while political instruction based primarily on the three principles of the people (and instilling a Bushido code) made up the other three quarters of the lessons. Beyond his ideological approach to politics and military instruction, Chiang was a very strict leader, valuing obedience and ideological purity above all else, for example, withholding supplies from military commanders in World War 2 whom he judged to be disloyal and harboring communist sympathies.
Chiang was extremely willing and able to forcefully implement his values. As a revolutionary, he was a very decisive and skilled commander. In his leadership of the Kuomintang, he was far more decisive than Sun Yat-sen, for example choosing to push forward with the Northern Expedition that Sun had been hesitating on starting. Unlike Sun, who relinquished power in 1911 to Yuan Shikai, Chiang never willingly relinquished power except for one resignation in 1927 in which he knew he would be asked to come back (and he was asked to come back a few months later). As President in both China and later Taiwan, he maintained a dictatorship where most power was centralized in his hands (though warlords who willingly submitted to his rule were allowed to maintain their territory with high degrees of autonomy) and dissent was strictly punished. Examples can be seen all throughout Chiang’s rule but notable examples include the 2/28 incident in Taiwan, the 1927 purge of communists from the Kuomintang, and his crackdown and intimidation of wealthy capitalists.
Chiang also excelled at political power-struggles. Understanding how to use his leverage to win, Chiang emerged successful from power struggles against Wang Jingwei in 1927, and against various generals and reformers in Taiwan, not to mention his ability to gain American support for relatively minor concessions throughout World War 2 and during diplomatic crises with the Communist mainland while in Taiwan.
Chiang’s constant focus on obedience to principles, his desire for principled perfection in his personal life and his adherence and enforcement of strict ideological principles in military and political matters were the core of his personality. While Sun Yat-sen was an inspirational revolutionary leader, he faced constant setbacks and failures. After overthrowing the Qing dynasty, Sun Yat-Sen was unable to prevent China from falling under Yuan Shikai’s dictatorship and later splintering among warlords. It was Chiang who brought the strict legalism, enforcement, and decisiveness to the Kuomintang necessary to, at least on paper, reunify China and see through the revolution to the end. This clearly suggests strong and valued L+F, with L taking precedence and F used in a supporting role, best fitting L1 and F2.
Though Chiang Kai-Shek was certainly decisive in his leadership, he also had the ability to be patient, wait for better opportunities and take time to set up a more favorable scenario. Examples of this can be seen in his decisions to appease Japan during their pre-1937 attempts at expansion into China, such as not fighting against their invasion of Manchuria. In Taiwan, Chiang’s goal was to create a model society that would show what China could be capable of and thus raise support for a Kuomintang counter-attack against the Communist mainland or in some other way result in the mainland becoming more aligned with (or under the control of) the Kuomintang. This would seem to suggest some capability in Chiang’s use of T, however, it would be difficult to characterize his use of T as strong or an aspect given a lot of focus. Chiang Kai-shek would prove to be unreasonably stubborn in his long term plans, one example being his continued attempts to crush the Communist rebellion and appease Japan’s expansionist desires while doing so, a course he pursued throughout the 1930s against all internal opposition, which eventually led a patriotic warlord, Zhang Xueliang, to kidnap Chiang and force him to forge an alliance with the Communists. Chiang’s stubbornness and lack of foresight would come up again in failed strategies against Japan (such as the decision to stake his best German-trained divisions against Japan in the hopeless battle for Shanghai) and his decision to stake most of his army in a battle for Manchuria against the Communists. One bad decision is normal for everyone. A few bad decisions can be explained in other ways, however frequent poor decisions related to extreme stubbornness and lack of foresight show that despite a seemingly adequate capability in T, it was still clearly a weak spot.
Despite this weakness, along with his valuing of F, Chiang Kai-Shek can also be shown strongly valuing T. Chiang at all times sought to align his actions with a long-term plan for China’s (later Taiwan’s) political development. He agreed with Sun Yat-sen’s vision of a unified, democratic, modernized China that could defend itself with foreign imperialism and aligned with Sun’s plan for how this would be achieved. Specifically, this followed a three-step plan, starting with military unification, then “political tutelage”, which was a period of authoritarian rule during which citizens were supposed to be taught their rights and how to engage in politics, and ending with a transition to constitutional democratic governance. It should be noted that this process for long-term transition to an independent democratic China was laid out by Sun, not Chiang. Chiang simply followed the path Sun laid out, starting with the Northern Expedition (which Sun remained indecisive on and kept putting off until his death), then political tutelage during the Nanjing decade. It should also be noted that political tutelage, i.e. authoritarian rule, never ended on Taiwan until after Chiang’s death. A charitable interpretation of this would be that Chiang lacked confidence in how events would play out if he made the final transition to democratic government, believing that he alone knew what was best and that others could not rule the country as well as he could, and a lack of confidence in his ability to indirectly influence events, indicating a greater confidence in L, F, and to a certain extent P than in T. A less charitable interpretation would be that Chiang simply desired to remain in power despite his stated views, in which the point that he lacked confidence in indirect influence remains true, indicating he was still more confident in F than T. However charitably you choose to interpret this, the conclusion is still the same: Chiang was more confident in L and F than he was in T. Chiang Kai-shek’s inconsistent ability to plan ahead, his inheriting a long-term vision from someone else much more confident in T, and greater confidence in F over T put together makes T6 very obvious. The unreasonable stubbornness and resistance to the advice of others to pursue alternate paths is characteristic of I4.
Linked with Chiang Kai-shek’s long-term vision was something of a messiah complex. Chiang was himself very emotionally invested in his T based ideals, believing his destiny to be synonymous with China’s destiny, as was seen in his diary. Chiang was quite private about these feelings, only writing about them in his diary, but nonetheless it was still present and formed a large part of his psychology. It is clear that Chiang valued E with T, however E was still a clear weakness of his. Chiang had an exceedingly unappealing personality. Words consistently used to describe him include "harsh", "cantankerous", "abrasive", "aloof", and worse. Beyond being thoroughly unlikeable personally, Chiang was also out of touch with the views of ordinary citizens, most notably with his allowance of widespread corruption within the military and the Kuomintang, and while the Kuomintang and army did function well enough to get by despite the rampant corruption, Chiang was utterly oblivious to how this corruption negatively affected his image in both the United States (whose support he desperately needed in the civil war against Mao) and his image among average Chinese citizens, most of whom were peasants. Mao, on the other hand, had a very strong understanding of image-management and a very appealing personality, and it was due to these skills of his that many Chinese peasants flocked to his banner and Kuomintang soldiers defected en masse to join the Communists. It is clear that Chiang valued E yet was oblivious to how to manage aspects related to E, making E5 most fitting.
Despite his unlikeable personality, Chiang Kai-shek was still capable of maintaining decent personal relations with others, though not consistently or with any apparent nuance. For example, he faced serious personal difficulties with the American overseer of the Chinese war effort, General Joseph Stilwell, whose arrogance, condescension, and ambition caused him to frequently clash with Chiang. For his part, Stilwell was offended by Chiang’s arrogance, stubbornness, and strictness. Nonetheless Chiang could make personal concessions and overtures to placate Stilwell’s ambition. Chiang was also able to get along with other leaders on a personal basis, such as President Franklin D. Roosevelt (SEE), or Mahatma Gandhi (IEI) whom Chiang met with personally to convince him to avoid sabotaging the British war effort, not to mention his ability to inspire personal loyalty in some of his warlord allies such that even when his ally Zhang Xueliang kidnapped Chiang in 1936 to force him to form a united front against Japan with the Communist rebels, Zhang had no plans to harm Chiang and in fact pledged his loyalty to Chiang while imprisoning him. Still, back in Nanjing, Chiang took the opportunity while Zhang was with him to arrest him, and Zhang would remain under house arrest until Chiang’s death in 1975.
However, Chiang Kai-shek still faced difficulties with regard to personal relationships, with his relationship with Stilwell repairing then breaking down consistently. While sometimes making exceptions for close relationships, he could at other times be very ruthless, for example, in a rather notable example of Chiang’s rare vindictiveness, just before fleeing to Taiwan as the Communists were winning the mainland, Chiang went back to the wartime capital Chongqing and suddenly executed several military officers who were imprisoned in 1936 for their role in the aforementioned kidnapping (though Zhang Xueliang himself was transported to Taiwan where he remained under house arrest). What this all shows is a serviceable capability in R, but with no real value or nuance. As seen in his ability to appeal to others on an interpersonal level (though not emotionally), his handling of those military officers, his relationship with Zhang Xueliang, and in his indecisiveness regarding his relationship with Stilwell, Chiang Kai-shek was someone with enough understanding of the importance of personal loyalty and other R related aspects, with a good ability to inspire personal loyalty in others. However, this was without confidence or skill and always subservient to his ideological values, that is, subservient to L, with only rare moments of personal vindictiveness. These are traits most consistent with R3.
Chiang Kai-shek’s management of China is notable for its success in spite of the numerous problems facing the country at the time. Between the unification of China following the Northern Expedition in 1928 and Japan’s invasion of China in 1937, under Chiang’s leadership, China went through the Nanjing decade, named after the capital city Nanjing. The Nanjing decade, while marred by its human rights abuses and authoritarianism, was nonetheless a period of unprecedented economic growth. Despite the Communist rebellion at the time, excessive corruption (which Chiang allowed as it did not cause too much inefficiency to deal with, and Chiang believed he had more pressing concerns) and frequent clashes with (and concessions to) Japan, China remained stable and successful. After fleeing to Taiwan, Chiang's goal was to position Taiwan as a model alternative to the Communist mainland, primarily through economic success, which he managed extremely skilfully. Taiwan’s economic success exceeded the success of the Nanjing decade, due to the combination of Chiang’s skilful management and generous economic aid from the United States. The Nanjing decade ended with Japan’s invasion, but even after the war against Japan devolved into a stalemate across a massive frontline and despite Japan’s blockade (and capture) of Chinese ports, Chiang still maintained China’s domestic economy well, with inflation kept to a minimum and daily life continuing as usual for those living far away from the front. Rampant inflation would not take hold over China until after the Communist victory in the battle for Manchuria in 1948.
Chiang Kai-shek however, was always motivated by something other than proper management and economic success. Chiang’s motivations were always ideological, and Chiang would willingly neglect pragmatic management if they interfered with these. For example, during battles against Japan late in the war Chiang, withheld important supplies from generals he believed to be disloyal or have Communist sympathies. Another example would be how Chiang focused far more on ideological education than military tactics in the Whampoa military academy. Yet another example was in Chiang allowing officials loyal to him to engage in massive corruption, only cracking down on corruption after setting himself up in Taiwan. Chiang Kai-shek clearly had a very strong use of P, but still not valued above his ideological views, and when faced with a choice between P and L, Chiang always chose L, a dismissive attitude consistent with P7.
And lastly, in Chiang Kai-shek’s private life, he led a very calm and regimented existence. He woke up early, went to bed early, ate well, and took good care of himself, suffering few health issues until he was in his 70s. This stands in stark contrast to Chiang’s wife, Soong Mayling (EIE), who suffered frequent health issues (including mental health and physical health) and often sought treatment in American hospitals for her ailments. Chiang put great emphasis on taking care of himself physically, though primarily for the purposes of keeping himself capable of taking on the political and military challenges he faced. His pleasant lifestyle and healthy habits were not for the sake of his own enjoyment. Beyond this, Chiang Kai-shek was also frequently focused on minute details as a military leader, known for his frequent micromanagement. We can clearly see from this that Chiang Kai-Shek focused extensively on S but didn’t see it as having inherent value, which is very consistent with S8.
With L1, F2, R3, I4, E5, T6, P7, and S8, Chiang Kai-shek is a clear example of an LSI.
To learn more about LSI, click here.
If you are confused about our use of Socionics shorthand, click here.
Sources
My primary source is Jay Taylor’s biography The Generalissimo: Chiang Kai-shek and the Struggle for Modern China.
No comments:
Post a Comment